I’m not anchored in any position on this question so I appreciate your article. However, it seemed like you avoided the Orthodox objections to the filioque.
What of their claim that this idea creates an imbalance in the Trinity with the Son’s existence being totally dependent upon His being begotten of the Father (one source) while doubl…
I’m not anchored in any position on this question so I appreciate your article. However, it seemed like you avoided the Orthodox objections to the filioque.
What of their claim that this idea creates an imbalance in the Trinity with the Son’s existence being totally dependent upon His being begotten of the Father (one source) while double procession proposes two sources (the Father and the Son) for the procession of the Spirit?
I’m not anchored in any position on this question so I appreciate your article. However, it seemed like you avoided the Orthodox objections to the filioque.
What of their claim that this idea creates an imbalance in the Trinity with the Son’s existence being totally dependent upon His being begotten of the Father (one source) while double procession proposes two sources (the Father and the Son) for the procession of the Spirit?